| Title | A review of recent developments in climate change science. Part II: The global-scale impacts of climate change |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2011 |
| Authors | Gosling, SN, R. Warren, N. W. Arnell, P. Good, J. Caesar, D. Bernie, J. Lowe, P. van der Linden, JR O'Hanley, and SM Smith |
| Journal Title | Progress in Physical Geography |
| Volume | 35 |
| Start Page | 443 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pagination | 443-464 |
| ISBN Number | 03091333 |
| Keywords | agriculture, Climate change impacts, ecosystems, health, IPCC, ocean acidification, sea-level rise, water resources |
| Abstract | This article presents a review of recent developments in studies assessing the global-scale impacts of climate change published since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). Literature covering six main impact sectors is reviewed: sea-level rise (SLR) and coastal impacts, ocean acidification, ecosystems and biodiversity, water resources and desertification, agriculture and food security, and human health. The review focuses on studies with a global perspective to climate change impacts assessment, although in the absence of global studies for some sectors or aspects of impacts, national and regional studies are cited. The review highlights three major emerging themes which are of importance for the policy- and decision-making process: (1) a movement towards probabilistic methods of impacts assessment and/or the consideration of climate modelling uncertainty; (2) a move towards assessing potential impacts that could be avoided under different climate change mitigation scenarios relative to a business-as-usual reference scenario; and (3) uncertainties that remain in understanding the relationship between climate and natural or human systems. Whether recent impact assessments show a changed risk of damage to human or natural systems since the AR4 depends upon the impact sector; whether the assessments are robust or not (i.e. will stand the test of time) requires additional expert judgement. However, using this judgement, overall we find an increased risk to natural systems, and in some components of human systems. © The Author(s) 2011. |
| DOI | 10.1177/0309133311407650 |
| Tyndall Consortium Institution | UEA |
| Research Programme | Integrated Modelling |
- Home
- Research
- Cities and Coasts
- Energy and Emissions
- Governance and Behaviour
- People
- Publications
- Analysing Carbon Trading
- Connecting science and policy
- CONSENSUS
- LIAISE
- NEARCO2
- NSA
- (REDD)
- RESPONSES
- SCOOPI
- Sustainability Omni Labelling
- UKSHEC Plus
- Attitudes to Low-carbon Transport
- Communication and Scepticism
- Dynamics of Domestic Electricity Supply
- Energy Biographies
- IAGP
- Risk Perception and Nanotechnologies
- Smart Grids Scenarios
- Transforming the UK Energy System
- Water and Land
- Model Facilities
- PhD Research
- Fudan Research
- Communication
- People
- Partners
- Publications
- Contact us
- INTRANET
- JOBS